|
Poster:
|
bigdaddyrico85 |
Date:
|
March 11, 2010 07:25:49pm |
|
Forum:
|
more_animation
|
Subject:
|
Re: Gulliver's Travels |
No. It's the feature length movie. Anything over 61 minutes is considered feature length. Anything 60 mins and under is a short.
|
Poster:
|
billbarstad |
Date:
|
March 11, 2010 07:39:10pm |
|
Forum:
|
more_animation
|
Subject:
|
Re: Gulliver's Travels |
I meant the question rhetorically. My intent was to say that the film should be moved to another collection.
|
Poster:
|
bigdaddyrico85 |
Date:
|
March 12, 2010 03:22:17pm |
|
Forum:
|
more_animation
|
Subject:
|
Re: Gulliver's Travels |
Ok. My bad. Well, Its moved now. lol.
|
Poster:
|
cosmico |
Date:
|
March 11, 2010 07:52:10pm |
|
Forum:
|
more_animation
|
Subject:
|
Re: Gulliver's Travels |
Believe it or not, according to the Academy, a short is 30 minutes or less. Anything longer is a feature. They probably created that rule in the 30s or 40s when it wasn't all that uncommon to have 45 or 50 minute feature films, especially westerns from the "poverty row" studios.
|
Poster:
|
BillyEyeDull |
Date:
|
March 16, 2010 10:16:07am |
|
Forum:
|
more_animation
|
Subject:
|
Re: Gulliver's Travels |
You never heard of the Three Worlds of Gulliver?
|
Poster:
|
bigdaddyrico85 |
Date:
|
March 20, 2010 04:49:34pm |
|
Forum:
|
more_animation
|
Subject:
|
Re: Gulliver's Travels |
Heard of. Never seen. Any good?
|
Poster:
|
bigdaddyrico85 |
Date:
|
March 13, 2010 03:33:25am |
|
Forum:
|
more_animation
|
Subject:
|
Re: Gulliver's Travels |
Wow. Thats alot of Gulliver. Maybe they should delete them.
|
Poster:
|
BoopBoopaddoop |
Date:
|
December 03, 2010 03:40:51pm |
|
Forum:
|
more_animation
|
Subject:
|
Re: Gulliver's Travels |
You Boop Boop a Dooping! Cant Beat the Fliescher Studio's version of gullivers Travels. me personally have always found that story boring but its great with giant's and tiny little people.
TVNews
OpenLibrary